Tom, I agree that the length might be an issue, but there aren't many questions that I feel we could drop (maybe SPDY support, since strictly speaking it's not part of the web pki). I can explain when I send out the survey that we'd like all questions answered, but if that's not possible, answer as many as possible.
None of your points were discussed previously. - Feeding in a cert db: Is that as important as asking what response is given for non-issued certs? - Nonce - I'll add text as you suggest - Record size - I'll add text as you suggest. BTW, to everyone else: I noticed that #&$%! Word mangled the formatting and lost the numbering in some places. I'm cleaning that up. -Rick From: wpkops [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Ritter Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [wpkops] Survey Last Call This is quite an extensive survey. I wonder if it's length may reduce response rate. However, I think it does capture a lot of very important information, and I'm anxious to see collected responses. Perhaps it would be appropriate to indicate that response is not required, but we are trying to collect this information and that if they are unable to respond we'll have to do our best to figure out their product's capabilities through testing. (In my experience, some questions, like the wildcards, are likely to need testing even if the company thinks they know how they work ;)) I did notice the following. Apologies if these were ruled out in earlier discussions. - OCSP Responder does not inquire after an ability to feed in a certificate database for returning different answers for not-issued certs - OCSP Responder Nonce probably needs a "If the user configured it to" option, or just add the word 'support' to the question - Perhaps it would be worth asking if you are able to tweak the SSL Record Size for performance reasons -tom
_______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
