2.1.2 states: [RFC5280] requires that a CRL entry specify a reason code... I think this is incorrect. RFC 5280, Section 5.3, paragraph 3 states: ... CRL issuers SHOULD include reason codes...
That's the only place I can find anything close to a requirement to specify reason codes, so I would suggest that 2.1.2 be amended to say that RFC5280 strongly encourages that a CRL entry specify a reason code > -----Original Message----- > From: wpkops [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of internet- > [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Web PKI OPS Working Group of the > IETF. > > Title : Web PKI Operations: Revocation and Status > Authors : Phillip Hallam-Baker > David Chadwick > Filename : draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt > Pages : 17 > Date : 2014-05-13 > > Abstract: > This document describes the certificate status mechanisms supported > in the Web PKI > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > wpkops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ wpkops mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops
