+1

As some other have already said, the charter of the WG calls for documenting current
Web PKI practices, not describing what one might wish were true.

Steve

Ben,

I reviewed what I think is the latest draft at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilson-wpkops-browser-processing-01, not the Word doc attached to the previous message.

Section 2.1: Is it worth pointing out that root stores are not fixed? Not only can they be extended via automatic download (as you pointed out), but enterprises can add and remove roots (as often happens in Windows environments) and browser users can manually add or remove roots or modify trust bits. Document readers may not be aware of those other possibilities.

Section 2.2: It might be helpful to readers to explain here why Firefox does not do "AIA chasing". In other words, they don't see it as a missing feature; they choose to fail on incomplete chains, and a case can be made as to why this behavior is preferable to the behavior of other browsers. Or do we just want to point out differences among browsers without trying to explain why those differences exist (where we understand why)?

Section 3.1 The introduction says "This document reviews the current processing behaviors...", but this Section is full of "should"s. I suggest it needs to be rewritten to factually describe current behavior.

Section 3.4 seems speculative and not descriptive of current browser behavior.

Section 3.5 Header is not in bold.

Section 4.3 Shouldn't say "browsers should" ;^)

-Rick

*From:*wpkops [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:13 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Here is another draft with suggested changes from Santosh accepted, and the addition of "Security Considerations" subsections, based on our discussions of May 13^th .

*From:*wpkops [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:44 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Here is a first pass through the browser behavior document that I sent to Robin and Santosh yesterday.



_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

_______________________________________________
wpkops mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

Reply via email to