|
this was not an issue of the little system vs the big system. this was a case of a big system and a small system vs the little guy (s) and the little guy (s) barked back -- -- in a polite, ordered, well documented canadian sort of way -- at both their incompetence in this situation. remember, nobody beats a canadian when it comes to letter writing. well, maybe the british -- but only to the bbc the struggle continues peace chris wrote: http://www.sleepybrain.net/vanilla.html\this reminds me so much of when lanny's noisetext group got shut down on yahoo (and i for one lost many writings that were important to me, cause i wrote a lot of them direct into the web form for yahoo groups and viewed them online, no copies saved on my machine anywhere). and they trashed the group without so much as a warning. no notice, nothing. in the course of muttering under my breath to various people about how it was an outrage that yahoo could just lay waste to whatever things they felt like on a whim (since we were subject to their "terms and conditions"), many people were basically trying to be apologists for them, saying that it's not censorship when it's a private company, they can do what they want, etc., and we agreed to that by using the service. well, sure, technically this is true. but it obscures some more troubling issues, one being that these web communities are being used by a lot of people in ways that community centers were in the past, and now, with these community centers being operated by private organizations (and look at how quickly the right wing of the U.S. political system is to try to shunt everything away from governmental organizations over to the private sector), there is a loss in accountability every step of the way, and it is misleading people to have them think that this benevolent service provided by corporations is somehow without hidden agendas, and risks allowing more and more power to fall into corporate hands that really have no accountability to anyone but their debt holders and investors. i have almost no doubt that it was the powerful political commentary and the explosively powerful vibes of many of the carefully constructed "auto-texts" that were being generated on the group that caused a reactionary clamp-down, because it was angry, organized and extremely intense.. i am still amazed at some of the things that came out of that group, and so some squealing meanie just couldn't take the raw, oozing ventfest, which was revealing some very ugly behind-the-scene snapshots of this culture. and it was horribly wrong to have that all ripped away in the manner that it was. i will never, EVER place trust in any of these corporations to be wise stewards of anything. and i will always carry a little black soot in my heart for whoever that loser was that stole all that away one day. this networked world carries a number of new risks that take a while to fully comprehend. and all these happy, smiley-faced support group web sites are setting people up for some dangerous power plays. we can't let our organizing efforts get locked up inside some corporation's hard drive. this is so easy to let happen, i'm worried for all of us.On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ishaq wrote: \ http://www.world-crisis.com/analysis_comments/766_0_15_0_C/ \ \ http://ilovepoetry.com/search.asp?keywords=braithwaite&orderBy=date\ \ |
- Re: Racist Tactricks of Victoria Indy Media?-- telus confir... Ishaq
- Re: Racist Tactricks of Victoria Indy Media?-- telus c... Lawrence Upton
