----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Ulmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 6:21 AM
Subject: Gregori Maiofis


I received a post from an art critic doing a review of an exhibition of
the work of Gregori Maiofis.  The critic said that during an interview
Maiofis said that Applied Grammatology had been an inspiration for some of
his work.  Asked to comment, I checked out the Website and filed the
following paragraphs.

fyi
glue

* Gregory Ulmer *
web.nwe.ufl.edu/~gulmer
University of Florida

---------- Forwarded message ----------

reviewing www.maiofis-wba.com/web/index.htm

>From a grammatological perspective, the art of Gregori Maiofis
contributes to the tradition of the search for a universal language,
perhaps commenting in general on the ruins or fragmentary survivals of
this tradition.  The basis for this reading of the oeuvre is the Tarot
series, which serves as a key for the other works.  Condensing most if
not all of the wisdom epistemologies of Western civilization, Tarot in its
popular spiritualist form is a remnant of the dream of a perfect language
that motivated humanistic thought from Plato to Leibniz. In the eighteenth
century this tradition lost credibility and went underground, or was
pushed to the margins of culture by the rise of empirical science.  The
relevance of this tradition for today is what may be learned regarding the
capacity of graphic imaging to produce a category system--a
metaphysics--that does for digital media what Greek ontology did for
alphabetic writing.  The prototype for an image metaphysics during the
Renaissance was the Egyptian hieroglyph; during the Baroque era it was the
Chinese ideogram.  However mistaken the understanding of these writing
systems may have been, in both cases the result was a major innovation in
arts practices (the emblem books, and vorticism, for example). Maiofis's
series represent an exploration of atmospheres and moods evoked by image
sequences, without the security of a cosmology.  We are separated from the
star, as Blanchot said in defining this era of dis-aster.

Despite the superannuation of cosmology in contemporary knowledge, the
astrological categories appropriated by Western wisdom traditions retain
their categorical power. The Tarot anchor suggests the potential of an
image to locate an archetype in contemporary collective memory, in the
absence of any consensus. Maiofis's series are "archeological" in
Foucault's sense--an archeology of image knowledge, suggesting the
parameters of possible signification.  The artists' role, in these
conditions that Lyotard called the differend, is to invent new genres,
new rules of linking from one node or sign to another, transversally, to
map a potential network of relationships from which may emerge an
unanticiapted coherence (what Ezra Pound called a vortex).  This
experiment in invention of genres is well underway in the career of
Gregori Maiofis.

Reply via email to