|
deraingment of the senses
yeah! emoticons should perhaps be replaced w/ emiticons
using some sort of electroempathetic headset which reads symbols
and translates them into brainwave precursers or something.
then we could go from code straight to a kind of experiential music
without any intermediary "content"..
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:39
AM
Subject: Re: RGBPerm 01
Tradition, hmmm. .
.
Well, there’s Mathew Barney, whom I
don’t care for, but since you asked. . .
There’s that woman – I can
think of several women actually, which is interesting in and of itself --
Rebecca Horn. . .
Yes,
got the pun, -- and the deraingment of the senses! Sorry if I didn't make that
clear, but I've got an aversion to smileys.
m
On Aug 3, 2005,
at 10:33 AM, Lanny Quarles wrote:
it was a pun on fauvism.. hence
derain and
vlaminck..
foveal
vision reminds me of those performance artists who purposively distort
their own vision with
harsh lenses helmets etc. can you name some of the artists who have
worked by deliberately
distorting their own sensory perceptions using some
kind
of instrument or
peripheral. i can't think of any, but i know there is a tradition of this.
lq
-----
Original Message -----
From:
mwp
To:
[email protected]
Sent:
Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:42 AM
Subject:
Re: RGBPerm 01
Yes, I find that its
easier for me to see changes in the various transformations when I am
working with an existing image that is very familiar to me rather than
with something new. And since I’m dealing with issues of color here, what
better source than one of the modern masters of color,
Matisse?
Faux vision? Hm. Of course, there’s also foveal vision,
which involves blurring. . .
m
On Aug 2, 2005, at 11:03
PM, Lanny Quarles wrote:
it is of course the Green Stripe.. I guess I was just a
bit surpised
you'd left in some recognizability, and was thinking
there was something
to that. now why i brought up the whole
digitization thing is beyond me. i think in the cluster
the wrong
thought altogether got expressed, my mind being much like a spasmodic
swiss cheese
forgetting and remembering simultaneously and the
hairstyle even reminds
me of a lautrec image. no wait, .. I was
thinking about "FAUX-VISM"
or faux-vision.. at any rate, you still
have Derain and Vlaminck..
M a dame S am ur ai Ma
tisse
lq
----- Original Message -----
From:
"mwp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005
7:22 PM
Subject: Re: RGBPerm 01
> Well, yes, LQ, your point
definitely has been taken into consideration
> prior to the
conceptualization of the work. Like it or not, I think we
> all
have learned to live with the fact that there will never be a
pure,
> unmediated representation of this – or any -- image
available for
> re-representing, except in one’s head perhaps,
should one be fortunate
> enough to see the painting in person and
be capable making of such
> complex calculations as I have done
without aid of a computer.
> Naturally, I consider the work only a
rough study in relation to its
> source, not a perfect match, in a
world where perfection is not only
> not possible, and not only
not sought after, but its opposite actually
> incorporated as part
of the process and allowed to maintain itself as
> long as it is
kept under control, like a bacterium within the body. The
>
marriage of signal and noise? Okay, I can live with that,
however
> one-sided and hastily arranged the marriage may be.
Besides, what
> alternative are you proposing? That I wait for
Godot to bless me with
> an idealized vision of the whole? Not
me.
>
> And Thanks, Joel, I thought of Warhol
too!
>
> m
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2005, at 6:53
PM, Lanny Quarles wrote:
>
>> but you're not really
working from the matisse at all,
>> but from a re-presentation
ala instrumental transduction
>> aka digitization.. so is this
little unsaid level of detail
>> important as irony or hoax
or?
>>
>>
lq
>>
>
|
