thanks,i 'll look it up. already made some mistakes,161 and surely 875 aren't p after all, but interestingly they're at position 12 AND 24..
- Re: on primes noemata
- Re: on primes Lanny Quarles
- Re: on primes BjørnMagnhildøen
thanks,i 'll look it up. already made some mistakes,161 and surely 875 aren't p after all, but interestingly they're at position 12 AND 24..