Dear Bob,

The mistake one makes is in the assumption that words
mean anything. It's the context, as you know, which
emboldens. This idea, while not clearly articulated or
perhaps understood by many in the past, is what's new.
This is what one is attempting to accomplish by
'cut-up methodology' (although many are still unaware
of this). The methodology is outmoded, the gamble that
something barely representative of intelligible
communication might arise is the stooge whereby actual
communication is relugated to periphery and to the
detriment of--. One might say a scribble is something,
maybe can coerse others to become excited by it, but
this is not poetry's role (as it is to make people
excited by what is communication and the possibility
thereof). Surely it is fun, which is worthwhile (of
course), but that is something entirely different. A
parallel could additionally be made between what is
created and how it is read (spoken word), and how its
worth is perseved by audience carried by waves of
emotion and not by what is articulated. To denegrate
poetry so, because it might provide one with easy
answers to the hard process of discovery, I might
liken to academito lower one's standard as to
unconsciably deficate on one's self. And I want to
suggest that words like 'academic exercise' says
nothing, nada, and more manipulative in political
context--and leads one to sadly consider the Pied
Piper of Hamelin. And this recognition is no more
academic than Cummings, Kenneth Patchen, John Cage,
Creeley, and O'Hara (among others). To Deconstruct is
something, sure, a given, but its the space between
the words and behind the words that meaning something
and, remember, when they mean nothing, we are
cheapened.

As Pound said, and I'm paraprasing a quote passed
along by Robert Creeley, a poem must stand on the legs
of a biped, and its the work untimately that's
important (or, again, the communication therein). And
so Bob, as one is keenly aware of the process and
because we are good friends, I will not bore you with
further details.

AJ

AJ

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to