----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 1:41 AM
Subject: The British at epoetry 2005


> An MA degree in Poetic Practice was set up two or three years ago at
> Royal Holloway, University of London; it's directed by Redell Olsen and
> uniquely in this country (I believe?) for a literature department -- as
> opposed to visual arts -- combines poetry, and poetics, with study and
> practice in a range of technologies. (We heard yesterday however that
> something similar-sounding is starting up at De Montfort University,
> Leicester.) The programme is becoming a centre of gravity for new media
> writing of various kinds, and one of its graduates, John
> Sparrow, curated the showings yesterday (the final day of the conf). His
> own work includes (to my eye) highly accomplished Flash; juxtaposition
> of found imagery and text; and use of text randomising; and most
> importantly the words are good ... I enjoyed all the RHUL alumni work,
> albeit distracted by nerves about having to chair the discussion
> following. Ceridwen Buckmaster's elegantly presented piece combined
> composed text, emails (used with consent but anonymised) and several
> live voices. Elizabeth-Jane Burnett's was audaciously unelectronic but
> (I found) surprisingly affecting: she moved around the darkened room
> distributing yellow roses and whispering to individuals, finally leaving
> the room altogether. One audience member then read a message explaining
> that she had gone to place a rose at a location selected on instruction
> from another. A projected text invited everyone to propose locations for
> the placement of roses during the next 12 days. Effective verbal
> performances also accounted for much of the impact of Albert Pellicer's
> text, sound and image pieces. The visual for one was a simple
> stereoscopic inscription, 'The Paper is Dreaming'; look out for the
> snapshots of us all wearing those red-green glasses ... Birkbeck,
> another UL college, and Writers Forum Workshop, are each partly
> responsible for bringing together the loose grouping of poets and/or
> artists that is London Under Construction. Here, Stephen Mooney in the
> flesh was joined by some or all of the other 6 members (from various
> real locations) in a chatroom, where we saw them having a more or less
> consequential conversation while he read out transcripts of emails
> previously exchanged among them ... 'Close to the Literal' was a complex
> audio-visual collaboration by poet & artist Lawrence Upton (who also
> co-runs the WF workshop and the press) and composer John Drever. Colour
> images, deriving from coastal landscapes and letter-forms, provided a
> text/score for vocal performance: pre-recorded, live, and
> live-re-processed; thus both participants contribute both prepared and
> improvised material. The room was professionally wired (this takes
> hours) and the sound was fantastic. Think Dylan & Lanois (Oh Mercy). The
> piece was essentially episodic
> but a subtle architectonic seemed discernible over its length. A
> substantial achievement.
>
> To risk generalisations, London work in general seems to be ungeeky,
> informed by visual art practice, characteristically multi-media,
> live-performance orientated, site-specific, and still excited to explore
> the now-quotidian channels of electronic communication, often for
> collaboration. A real aspiration towards (to quote from Ceri's piece) 'a
> materially based making of the text into something of *use*' (my
> emphasis), and no easy belief in that possibility -- someone in the LUC
> chat said: 'the immediacy of these transactions renders them as good as
> useless.' They'll keep on struggling with that, as they should; but I
> felt ever so proud of them! it feels as though something is slowly but
> surely building up here.
>
> The day's other presentations were also of interest: Janis Jefferies,
> Professor of Art and Director of the Digital Studios at Goldsmiths
> showed documentation of a heavyweight collaborative project based in
> Montreal, concerning electronics, text and textiles (blah blah -- but it
> *is worth thinking about) e.g. 'smart' texts in garments and wall
> hangings, that can respond to the environment and viewers. The novelist
> Kate Pullinger, who moved into digital collaborations as a result of her
> association with trAce, explained and demonstrated the application to
> multimedia narrative of a new technology that enables reader interaction
> through breathing. You do what, Walt? you strap a microphone under your
> nose  ...? Clearly this is to conjure with in relation to prosthetic
> theories of human-computer interaction, and it doubtless has uses in
> disability etc., but I couldn't see it catching on for everyday!
>
>
> The conference was great; it was great to have it in London; and great
> to be able to hear and talk to Americans, French and Danish people,
> Germans, Austrians and others who had travelled here especially for it
> (and not all of them were even on the bill). It seems as though there is
> not exactly a mass home interest, though new media work could arguably
> extend poetics even for poets with no desire personally to leave page
> and stage. (Also several native or resident Brits who are active in the
> area were unfortunately unable to attend.) However, the conference was a
> definite success, tremendously stimulating and a lot of fun, and will I
> am sure have further consequences, for individuals who were there, and
> diffusing into the London poetry scene.
>
> e
>

Reply via email to