Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.266434, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 
2006.9.27.104442

-----

Subject:
A subject as trite as it is profound.
From:
Brent Bechtel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:02:21 -0600
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Mr. Olbermann,

Ten months ago, when I had TV, I found your show entertaining, but what 
I enjoyed most was the droll character of your delivery. Absent a TV, 
yet having a fast Internet connection, I have been able to watch a few 
of your editorial presentations from MSNBC (Countdown.)

Surprised by your heightened intensity (this is more noticeable as a 
comparison when 10 months of broadcasts have not been viewed,) I used 
the ubiquitous google search engine to determine reactions to your 
broadcasts.

"Amazing," I thought, "There are entire communities predicated on 
praising or defaming Olbermann."
(This was the cue for an eyebrow-crinkle and some eye-rolling on my part.)
"Olbermann is a talented orator -- whether his editorials are impromptu 
or read from cue-cards, he speaks fluently."

Fluent delivery; quick -- and a vocabulary and breadth of reference that 
may elude many viewers. A flaw, or
a strength, depending on the Network's demographic and psychographic 
goals -- but this is a distraction from my intended topic.

Websites also praise and defame Limbaugh, Zhirinovsky, Coulter, Stalin, 
-- so many persons of varying historical consequence.

(And what of Zachary Taylor, a rarely mentioned President? I think we do 
not, as humans, read history enough; afraid of mirrors, afraid of 
acceptance of commonality in those categories where failure may reside -- )

Trained in integrated marketing communications, and having explicitly 
studied the blending of tabloid (a derogatory connotation in the USA, at 
least) and -- oh, dry, boring, old-fashioned news -- I still hold 
strongly that FOX's promotional teams know exactly how to exploit[2] 
human behavior for projected, closely-quantifiable gain.

"Amuse us!" we say, ( "Myself included ... I fear ..." my whisper echoes 
--  )
Apologies. I almost said, "Entertain us!" -- but that would be more 
mocking of an allusion than I desire.

There is no escape from oblivion, as I found in my studies at university 
-- when all media exhibit, contain, express, and birth a tabloid, 
amusement-based, intellect-abating, sweet yet bitter herb[3] -- truly, 
only one who does not seek pleasure would choose otherwise.

Sincerely,
Brent Bechtel


---------------
Endnotes:
[1] This topic has likely been explored by others. I simply wished to 
communicate what are likely common ideas -- myself.
[2] Exploit is, of course, used here in its common advertising, 
communications, and heuristic / statistical / behavior modeling sense.
[3] There is usually a bitter or sweet or mixture or these symbols -- in 
any formulation -- but greed, as a simple summary, is its own power.


----
  • Clumsy Boredom: A Delirious Sackcloth Letter to a News or Sa... Brent Bechtel

Reply via email to