PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 807   December 29, 2006  by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein,
Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi
www.aip.org/pnu

DIRECT FORCE SENSING AT THE PICONEWTON LEVEL. The measurement of
mass can be carried out at the 10^-21 gram (zeptogram) level
(www.aip.org/pnu/2005/split/725-1.html) and of force to the 10^-18
newton (attonewton) level (Arlett et al., in Nano Letters, 2006).
But for many measurements in the cell biology world, this is too
much sensitivity. Forces in this realm are typically at the
piconewton (1 pN=10^-12 newton) level. Examples include the force
applied by the kinesin molecular motor protein to transport vesicles
(6 pN), the force needed to unzip a DNA molecule at room temperature
(9-20 pN), or the force needed to pull a DNA apart by pulling on
opposite ends (65 pN). Biophysicists need a cost-effective force
sensor that works reliably in water at the pN level. Steven Koch and
his colleagues at Sandia National Labs are well along on delivering
the needed sensor. The core of the device is a spring one millimeter
long but only a micron thick and is fabricated using a standard
polysilicon micromachining process. This spring operates according
to the classic experiment conducted by Robert Hooke in the 17th
century: the force exerted on the spring equals the amount of the
spring’s compression or extension multiplied by a spring constant,
which in this case is about 1 piconewton per nanometer. The spring,
mounted on a substrate, can be used in a number of ways: it can be
entrained to move with the push or pull of a biological sample or it
can be made sensitive to magnetic fields and so function as a field
sensor. The displacement of the spring is currently viewed by a
video camera with precision of 2 nm, but faster and more precise
methods are possible. Koch (now at the University of New Mexico,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) says that the most likely applications of the
new sensor will be in measuring forces on the kind of magnetic
microspheres used in single-biomolecule experiments and to calibrate
the electromagnets used in deploying microspheres in doing things
such as stretch, twist, or unzip DNA. He also envisions direct
mechanical force measurements, combined with other MEMS
(microelectromechanical systems) implements, in biophysical
experiments where optical tweezers (using laser beams to manipulate
the microspheres attached to molecules) cannot be used. The Sandia
sensor could be adapted to apply an adjustable tension to single DNA
molecules in order to study protein binding or enzymatic processes.
(Koch, Thayer, Corwin, de Boer., Applied Physics Letters, 23 Oct
2006)

NEW CRANKED-UP NUCLEAR STATES. Some nuclear physicists seek to make
new elements by fusing two nuclei and hope the amalgamated body will
hold together at least for a while. Other researchers explore the
nuclear world by creating new spin states. A highly spinning nucleus
is not "excited" in the usual sense of possessing a lot of internal
energy, but allows nevertheless the nucleus constituent protons and
neutrons to deploy themselves in new ways. This high-spin universe
is reached in
off-center smashups of two nuclei. In new experimental work at the
Lawrence Berkeley lab in California, erbium-158 nuclei were spun up
to very high rates and then closely observed as they slowed down by
offloading high energy photons. These  gamma rays, each carrying off
two units of angular momentum (each unit equals 2 times pi times
Planck's constant), are observed in the Gammasphere detector
surrounding the collision site; the number of the gamma rays
provides information about nuclear spin. So, for example, a nucleus
spun up to a level of 40 units would, by relaxing back to normal,
throw off about 20 gammas; other forms of nuclear radioactive
relaxation---throwing out electrons or alpha particles---take too
long to come about.
Theorists believe that above a spin value of about 46, the entire
Er-158  nucleus cannot be spun up any further without a drastic
rearrangement of the entire state of the nucleus. Instead a
spherical core of nuclear particles (constituting a gadolinium-146
nucleus) rotates no more while a fleet of 12 "valence" particles
(neutrons and protons) orbits the core at ever higher spin values
(see this progression of spin states in the figure  at
http://www.aip.org/png/2006/274.htm).  Eddie Paul of the University
of Liverpool ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and his colleagues have been able
to discover new pathways to a higher spin regime by observing the
pattern of gamma rays thrown out. They find evidence that the core
observed in previous experiments can occasionally break up a bit,
allowing collective rotation of all the nucleons to resume,
permitting the total spin of the nucleus to attain higher values.
The highest value observed in this way was a state with 65 units of
spin. The researchers hope to
explore even higher values of spin, maybe so high that the nucleus
approaches the fission limit.  At this point the nucleus does not
de-excite by losing gammas, but by actually fissioning---that is by
coming apart into large nuclear fragments.
(Paul et al., Physical Review Letters, upcoming article)

***********
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE is a digest of physics news items arising
from physics meetings, physics journals, newspapers and
magazines, and other news sources.  It is provided free of charge
as a way of broadly disseminating information about physics and
physicists. For that reason, you are free to post it, if you like,
where others can read it, providing only that you credit AIP.
Physics News Update appears approximately once a week.

AUTO-SUBSCRIPTION OR DELETION: By using the expression
"subscribe physnews" in your e-mail message, you
will have automatically added the address from which your
message was sent to the distribution list for Physics News Update.
If you use the "signoff physnews" expression in your e-mail message,
the address in your message header will be deleted from the
distribution list.  Please send your message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Leave the "Subject:" line blank.)

Reply via email to