PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 813   February 27, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein,
and Davide Castelvecchi                       www.aip.org/pnu

SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING IN WOMENS’ GENES. A spontaneous
aggregation of proteins randomly determines which of the two X
chromosomes in a woman's cell will remain active, and which one will
stay silenced, according to a new physical model. In all placental
mammals, the females of the species have two versions of the X
chromosomes while males have just one X, plus a Y chromosome. To
avoid overexpression of X-chromosome genes, female cells must
virtually shut down one of their X's.  X chromosomes are able to
wrap themselves up in a goo of RNA -- produced by one of their
genes, called XIST -- inhibiting the expression of all of their
genes. But until recently, it was not known how a female's cells
know that they have two X's, how they choose which one to shut down,
or how they keep exactly one active. Experiments in mice -- the
results presumably apply to other mammals -- have shown that during
early development, each embryo cell has a 50-50 chance of shutting
down one X or the other.  Recently it has been proposed that an X
remains active when certain proteins aggregate at a specific spot on
the chromosome, shutting down its "suicide gene" XIST. But it
remained unclear why proteins floating in the nucleus would
aggregate around one of the chromosome, but not around the other --
an example of what physicists call spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Now an upcoming paper in Physical Review Letters describes a
statistical-mechanics model for the proteins' aggregation that would
explain this phenomenon. The model relies on a key discovery
published last year, namely that in females the two X chromosomes
line up next to each other right at the time when one of them is due
to be silenced. For a critical value of the protein's binding
energies, the authors show, there is a high probability that exactly
one aggregate will form in the vicinity of the two chromosomes. The
aggregate will quickly bind to one of the X's, shutting down its
XIST gene and thus preventing the chromosome from silencing itself.
The model also explains how cells would "count" their X's. In males,
the protein complex would only have one chromosome to bind to, so it
would save the single X from self-silencing. On non-sexual
chromosomes, a similar mechanism could also determine which of two
versions of certain genes is expressed and which one is silenced.
(Nicodemi and Prisco, to appear in Physical Review Letters; contact
Mario Nicodemi University of Naples "Federico II,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also see:  Na Xu et al., Science, 24
February 2006, Bacher et al., Nature Cell Biology, March 2006,  and
Donohoe et al., Molecular Cell, January 12, 2007.)

STRING THEORY EXPLAINS RHIC JET SUPPRESSION.  String theory argues
that all matter is composed of string-like shreds in a
10-dimensional hyperspace assembled in various forms.  It has won
acclaim from many who appreciate the theory’s elegant mathematics
and ambition to unite quantum mechanics and general relativity, and
skepticism from others who cite the theory’s lack of a practical
track record.  String theory, the doubters say, makes no testable
predictions.
But this isn’t exactly true. Indeed, the theory has not yet been
experimentally vindicated in the realm of quantum gravity, but has
been put into play in the realm of high-energy ion collisions, the
kind carried out at Brookhaven’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
(RHIC). A few years ago string practitioners attempted to establish
a relationship between the 10-dimensional string world and the
4-dimensional (3 spatial dimensions plus time) world in which we
observe interactions among quark-filled particles like protons (for
background, see Physics Today, May 2005).  This duality between
string theory and the theory of the strong nuclear force, quantum
chromodynamics (QCD), was recently used to interpret puzzling early
results from RHIC, namely the suppression of energetic quark jets
that should have emerged from the fireball formed when two heavy
nuclei (such as gold) collide head on.  The thinking was that
perhaps the plasma of quarks and gluons (quarks bursting free from
their customary proton and meson groupings) wasn’t a gas of weakly
interacting particles (as was originally thought) but a gas of
strongly interacting particles, so strong that any energetic quarks
that might have escaped the fireball (initiating a secondary
avalanche, or jet, or quarks) would quickly be slowed and stripped
of energy on its way through the tumultuous quark-gluon plasma (QGP)
environment.
Two new papers by Hong Liu and Krishna Rajagopal of (MIT) and Urs
Wiedemann (CERN) address this problem.  The first paper calculates a
specific quark-suppression parameter (namely, how much the quarks,
each attached to a string dangling "downward" into a fifth
dimension, are pushed around as they traverse the quark-gluon
plasma) that agrees
closely with the experimentally observed value.
Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED], 617-253-6202) says that in the
second paper, the same authors make a specific testable prediction
using string theory that bears not just on missing jets of energetic
light quarks (up, down, and strange quarks), but on the melting or
dissociation temperatures of bound states of heavy quarks
(charm-anticharm or bottom-antibottom pairs) moving through the
quark-gluon plasma with sufficiently high velocity, as will be
produced in future experiments at RHIC and the Large Hadron Collider
(LHC) under construction at CERN. (Physical Review Letters: first
paper in the 3 November 2006 issue; second paper, upcoming article)
***********
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE is a digest of physics news items arising
from physics meetings, physics journals, newspapers and
magazines, and other news sources.  It is provided free of charge
as a way of broadly disseminating information about physics and
physicists. For that reason, you are free to post it, if you like,
where others can read it, providing only that you credit AIP.
Physics News Update appears approximately once a week.

AUTO-SUBSCRIPTION OR DELETION: By using the expression
"subscribe physnews" in your e-mail message, you
will have automatically added the address from which your
message was sent to the distribution list for Physics News Update.
If you use the "signoff physnews" expression in your e-mail message,
the address in your message header will be deleted from the
distribution list.  Please send your message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Leave the "Subject:" line blank.)

Reply via email to