rules for the separation of ideas and things, beliefs and practices

whatever you believe in you are not allowed to practice
whatever you practice you are not allowed to believe in

ideas are not to be realized in things
things are not to be idealized in ideas

you can practice something as long as you don't believe in it
you can believe in something as long as you don't practice it

this will rid us of hypocrisy by making it default

the two worlds

what about causality? the real and the possible? and language, and
self-understanding?

say you believe it's raining -
stop, is that a belief already?

let's define belief as something that is necessary to propose to be existent
you believe in something on the basis that you don't know
for example a belief in god is rather on the basis that he doesn't
exist than that he does. because if he existed it wouldn't be
necessary to believe in him. on the other hand, if he didn't exist it
would also surely be unnecessary to believe in him. ergo, it's
unnecessary to believe in him.
and beliefs in general might be of the same class
when you believe it's raining, isn't it already something you know,
and then already in the concept there's some hypocrisy, something that
is a firm basis in you comes out as an opinion, or a fact comes out as
a belief
also a cultural buffer, people necessarily disagree because they have
their own bodies
if you had my arm maybe not

we went for a walk and here we are, where ever it is

Reply via email to