|
Actually it was easier than that, set your FTP server to look for port
10021 traffic, and set your FW to pass port 10021 traffic via NAT.
Here is the troublshooting text.
I solved the secure FTP problem, at least within the building here...
Since you are trying to connect to an external server I'm not sure how much of
this will apply to you, but it's something to try.
The problem I was having is not the FTP software, it's the firewall. The rulebase is set up to allow FTP traffic (port 21) to the FTP server, as you would expect. Because is it port 21, the firewall is enforcing FTP traffic only on that port. However, because the port information in the header is encrypted, the firewall cannot verify that the data connection "belongs to" the control connection, and so immediately puts the ax to it. To solve the problem, I set up a generic protocol on port 10021 (any port besides 21 works though) and did not specify that it was FTP. When I set up my secure FTP client to connect to port 10021 using explicit encryption and passive mode, it immediately connected! PORT mode did not work, only passive. Furthermore, even if I specifically define the protocol as FTP in the firewall rules, it still works, as long as it's not port 21. My thoughts are that if you're trying to connect to this bank on port 21, their firewall may inherently be blocking it because it doesn't recognize it as FTP traffic. If you haven't tried it already, have them set up an object in their firewall that listens on port 10021 and does not specify a protocol. try connecting via FTPS and passive mode to that address - it may just work! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/28/03 08:36PM >>> Hi Seth, Tracy and
Peter,
If you don't mind sharing, we'd like to hear more about
the double NAT configuration after you have completed or gotten far
enough into your system testing. Pete's
suggestions to set the external IP address on Pro 8 is the quick approach
to try but if you end up using the double NIC, we'd like to hear the results of that approach
too.
Depending on your findings, we may put together
a Knowledge Base article or a case study so that we can share it with
other customers using similar network
topographies.
Thanks,
Kevin R. Gillis
Product Manager, WS_FTP Pro and Server
Ipswitch, Inc.
-----Original
Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Seth Berger Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems r ................................................................... This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. |
- [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Seth Berger
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Pete Simpson
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Seth Berger
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Kevin Gillis
- Re: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Tracy Sussman
- Re: [WS_FTP Forum] Double nat problems Seth Berger
- Seth Berger
