|
Claudio, it's been a while, but I seem to remember that I
was told by support that "implicit" SSL was not supported by WS_FTP.
Is that correct? That would indicate that FTP/SSL (AUTH SSL) would have to
be the selection.
Terry From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claudio Robles Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when making SSL conne ction I have run
WS_FTP Server and Client with double NAT and SSL for years without a problem.
However, as I said at least one side needs to be configure to forward a
small range of ports and to send the external IP address instead of their
own. Here I include
the logs for a session I just tried, where I connect from my box at work with IP
192.168.x.x to my Home box, which with IP 192.168.1.2, but across the Internet.
I did setup the server to use 5 ports, 1000-1004 and to return my
home external IP address (69.254.3.94). I also setup my home firewall
(Linksys) to forward those 5 ports to my server. These problems
with double NAT and SSL are common to all FTP programs. Not sure, if they
use FileZilla with FTP or SFTP. SFTP does not have this
problem. Claudio
Robles WS_FTP
Team Ipswitch,
Inc. Finding
Host cao.cl ... [2006.02.06
16:10:07.532] Connecting to 69.254.3.94:21 [2006.02.06
16:10:07.563] Connected to 69.254.3.94:21 in 0.031256 seconds, Waiting for
Server Response [2006.02.06
16:10:07.563] Initializing SSL Session ... [2006.02.06
16:10:10.423] 220 HP X2 WS_FTP Server 5.0.3
(181390554) [2006.02.06
16:10:10.423] AUTH TLS [2006.02.06
16:10:10.954] 234 SSL enabled and waiting for
negotiation [2006.02.06
16:10:13.674] SSL session NOT set for reuse [2006.02.06
16:10:13.767] SSL Session Started. [2006.02.06
16:10:13.767] Host type (1): WS_FTP Server [2006.02.06
16:10:13.767] XAUT 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<>372A1B==?6>A>A4A=86>7B;=@<6><=2A:6>B;A>>=<8B?=< [2006.02.06
16:10:13.892] 230 user logged in [2006.02.06
16:10:13.892] Host type (I): WS_FTP Server [2006.02.06
16:10:13.892] PBSZ 0 [2006.02.06
16:10:13.939] 200 PBSZ=0 [2006.02.06
16:10:13.939] PROT P [2006.02.06
16:10:13.971] 200 PRIVATE data channel protection level
set [2006.02.06
16:10:13.971] Sending "FEAT" command to determine what features this server
supports. [2006.02.06
16:10:13.971] FEAT [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] 211-Extensions supported [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] SIZE [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] MDTM [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] MLST
size*;type*;perm*;create*;modify*; [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] LANG EN* [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] REST STREAM [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] TVFS [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] UTF8 [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] AUTH SSL;TLS-P; [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] PBSZ [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] PROT C;P; [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] 211 end [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] Finished interpreting "FEAT"
response. [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] Sending the FEAT command is optional. You can disable it in
the site options of the profile. [2006.02.06
16:10:14.002] PWD [2006.02.06
16:10:14.080] 257 "/users/crobles" is current directory[2006.02.06 16:10:14.080]
TYPE A [2006.02.06
16:10:14.111] 200 Type set to ASCII. [2006.02.06
16:10:14.111] PASV [2006.02.06
16:10:14.158] 227 Entering Passive Mode
(69,254,3,94,3,232). [2006.02.06
16:10:14.158] connecting data channel to
69.254.3.94:3,232(1000) [2006.02.06
16:10:14.174] data channel connected to
69.254.3.94:3,232(1000) [2006.02.06
16:10:14.174] MLSD [2006.02.06
16:10:14.205] 150 Opening ASCII data connection for directory
listing 2006.02.06
16:10:14.658] # transferred 6200 bytes in 0.359 seconds, 134.757 Kbps ( 16.845
Kbps), transfer succeeded. [2006.02.06
16:10:14.658] 226 transfer complete From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Terry
LeBlanc Good feedback,
Pete. Not what I was wanting to hear...but good feedback.
Thanks. Based on this info,
we're better off sticking with FileZilla, which has worked beautifully in
passive mode through 2 firewalls with NAT since we originally installed
it. No muss, no fuss. I'll continue to
monitor... Terry From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete
Simpson We've been using WS_FTP
Server and Pro for SSL based FTP transfers for about 4 years. It's been
mostly reliable. Support at times has been difficult. We are a fan of the
product, but it does seem to be quite persnickety at times. The iterations
of the server since Version 5 have been much more problematic than version
4. Trying to run SSL based FTP through a firewall has proven to be nearly
impossible to implement reliably. Of late, we've had
several occasions where things were working just fine and then "poof" SSL is
broken. The tried-and-true fix has been simply to remove WS_FTP Server and
reinstall it from scratch with the EXACT same settings. Alternatively,
sometimes it's just one client reporting the issue -- so we have them remove and
reinstall the client. Yes, it's labor intensive and a pain in the
arse. But it has worked every time something has gone "poof" for no good
reason and when even ipSwitch support can not find a cause or fix. My
hypothesis is that changes in Windows 2003 Server and Win XP somehow monkey up
some portion of the registry upon which the ipSwitch products
rely. My
recommendations: 1.) If it was working,
nothing has obviously changed, and now it does not work is to remove the
product, reboot, and reinstall it with the exact same settings. So far
we're 5 for 5 on that "fix". 2.) If you're trying to
use SSL through your firewall w/ FTP-- don't. Put two NIC's in the server,
expose one externally and run SSL on that NIC. Yes, you need to do a bunch
of "cleanup" on that nic -- nothing should be bound to it (no file sharing
services, no print services) but TCP/IP. Then use an ACL on your router
between that NIC and the "global internet" and filter everything destined to
that NIC except the ports you need for SSL w/ FTP (ports 21 and
1024-5000).
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Terry
LeBlanc We have, but it's been
a few months. We can call again, now that the crush to get the web server
up and working is over. We needed and found a solution to get us moving
files securely after we hit a brick wall with WS_FTP Server...which surprised
me. I was the guy insisting on using it... Terry |
Title: Connection timeout error when making SSL connection
- AW: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when m... Jürgen Rentergent
- Re: AW: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout erro... Timothy Guy
- Re: AW: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout ... Susan Smith
- Re: AW: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection time... Timothy Guy
- [WS_FTP Forum] Unsubscribing... Kevin Gillis
- Re: [WS_FTP Forum] Unsubscribing.... Susan Smith
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Unsubscrib... Kevin Gillis
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when making... Terry LeBlanc
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when m... Claudio Robles
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when making... Terry LeBlanc
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when making... Terry LeBlanc
- RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Connection timeout error when m... Claudio Robles
