As a passing observation, Oracle and SQL Server are not the only databases 
out there that could be in shops where there is little or no postgresql 
knowledge in-house.  There are some (actually, quite a few) shops running 
Teradata as their database and some of them object to having even SQL 
Server as a requirement for tools/apps to work. 

I've done a couple of gigs at places that were looking for FTP Servers and 
have suggested WS-FTP but, were I to recommend 6.0, they would probably 
wind up looking elsewhere.

Respectfully,

Ralph D. Wilson II
Senior Programmer Analyst
Information Technology Department 
9311 San Pedro Suite 600
San Antonio TX 78216
(800) 527-0066 x7368
(210) 321-7368 (direct)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



"Chris Totten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/13/2007 09:32 AM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?






In terms of database access I think you should assume that someone will 
either have SQL-Server/Oracle already installed (and wish to use it) or 
that they won?t and won?t be bothered with installing a standalone 
database instance. Even if they didn?t have SQLS or Oracle installed I 
would imagine they would prefer to install an instance of either and point 
WS_FTP server at their newly installed instance rather than trust an 
installer (no matter how competent it may be) to do the installation as 
part of the install. Remember that first and foremost someone like myself 
wants an FTP server and would prefer an uncomplicated installation over 
something that tried to do doo much.
 
I?m having some problems with v6.0?s management web site, I can understand 
why you?ve switched from MMC/EXE to a HTML front end but it does make the 
product unusable if there is no fallback management client. For reasons I 
can?t cover here I can?t just use the default web site for the management 
front end so I created a new blank site for it. However when I used that 
site it doesn?t seem to work, the site uses host headers so even when I 
changed the URL for the WS_FTP server manager from 
http://127.0.0.1/WSFTPSVR/default.asp to 
http://ftpadmin.ctechs.co.uk/wsftpsvr/default.asp all I get is a blank 
page... 
 
I?ll keep trying ? but again I stress that having a web front end should 
be optional and not a requirement, a good ?old fashioned? EXE always 
works, but having the webby version only introduces a risk that the 
product won?t work unless it?s on a dedicated server (which this isn?t).
 
To respond to the detailed response from Pete, we have tried a lot of this 
and know all about the pitfalls of using UNC paths (domain accounts etc 
etc), but didn?t try Virtual Directories. When the Top Dir didn?t allow 
UNC paths I stopped there. I may have to go back (depending on experiences 
with 6.0) and try out your suggestions, but I do like the sound of 6.0 on 
paper, with the caveats explained above (insistence on a web management 
interface and proprietary database format).
 
Regards,
Chris
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: 12 June 2007 20:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?
 
hi peter,
 
great feedback!  you definitely found a nice way implement a HA solution!
 
so would sql server express work or  would you require full sql/oracle?
 
note that the lightweight postgresql is included with the installation of 
WS_FTP Server 6 with SSH and at the end of the Server 6 install, you are 
fully up and running with your ftp/s and your ssh server, hosts, groups, 
users, notifications, rules, etc. 
 
but we COMPLETELY the need and requirement to leverage your existing db 
infrastructure. 
 
bye for now,
 
kg
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Simpson
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 14:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?
Chris,
 
Use WS_FTP Server 5.04 with all patches.  Use a UNC path (NOT A DRIVE 
LETTER!) as part of a Virtual Directory mapped to a third host (your 
"fileserver").  Ensure you setup WS_FTP server process to run as a DOMAIN 
account (not local system as is the default) and it will maintain 
permissions on the UNC while "not logged on" interactively to the system, 
WS_FTP server can use standard SQL server (or Oracle) for storing user 
account credentials if you want -- just create a table per the 
documentation, define an System ODBC connection, and drop in the DLL.  All 
very well documented by WS_FTP and simple to deploy.  However, the 
configuration data of WS_FTP server is NOT in the database (just username, 
password, etc.) so you'll need a mechanism to ensure your changes to 
Virtual Directories etc are duplicated on both machines (IE, setting 
synchronization will be a Manual Process).

For HA, you CAN cluster WS_FTP Server 5.04. We have done it three times. 
No problems.  Setup a standard Windows Active/Passive cluster with your 
shared disk, quorum resource, and a virtual IP.  Install WS_FTP server on 
one machine with the destination directory being the shared disk resource 
(NOT THE QUORUM DISK).  Failover to other node.  RUN THE INSTALLATION FOR 
WS_FTP AGAIN AND SELECT THE EXACT SAME OPTIONS, again with binaries being 
on the shared disk resource.  Define a new "generic service" type of 
clustered resource.  The program to run is the WS_FTP Server executable 
from the shared disk.  Run it as a "service account" (valid domain 
account, NOT LOCAL SYSTEM).  make sure you set that on both nodes.  And 
the BIG KEY is to use Registry Replication (part of the generic service 
definition) to REPLICATE the IPSwitch registry key path between nodes. 
This ensures if you make changes to Virtual Directories, etc. on the 
active node and then fail-over to the second node that your changes still 
exist.  Make sure when you define your FTP site inside the server manager 
you use the Clustered VIRTUAL IP address -- it'll default to the local 
hosts IP on each node.  You just have to remember NOT to use that one 
since it's NOT the clustered address.
 
It'll take you a bit of time to setup, but it ABSOLUTELY works and WORKS 
GREAT.  Of course, it's not officially "supported" by IpSwitch...  but 
they were VERY interested when we told them how we did it.  I suspect they 
integrated some of what we told them (the above setup) into the officially 
"clusterable" version 6.  (IPSwitch product manager contacted me a couple 
of times while they were laying out specs for v6 about 9 months ago).
 
I do agree tho that the requirement (is it REALLY a requirement??) to use 
Postgres SQL for v6 is a deal killer.  I absolutely, positively, will NOT 
go to v6 if that's the case.  We absolutely, positively will NOT introduce 
a new database platform just to go to WSFTP 6.  We've been a customer for 
years, but if that's truly a requirement (that I can't use SQL or Oracle) 
we will find an alternative product to WSFTP Server.

Good Luck.

Pete
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Totten
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?
Hi there,
We have a pair of servers each one of which will be running WS_FTP server 
(to replace the buggy Microsoft Windows 2000 FTP server that?s already 
there).
The FTP site FQDN will be a VIP that could be directed to either of the 
two web servers. We need to set it up in such a way that both machines 
work with the same set of files, so their top directory should ideally be 
a UNC path.
The problem is I can?t seem to get WS_FTP server to recognise a UNC path ? 
it complains with the following error message:
?Only local fixed drives can be used for a Host?s Top Directory!? (the 
exclamation is a nice touch, like only a fool would want to be doing this)
Is there a way to do this, to get two or more servers to ?see? the same 
set of files?
TIA,
Chris
 

Chris Totten 
Technical Services Manager
 
028 9448 0000
www.ctechs.co.uk 
 


This email and all attachments it may contain is confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Consilium Technologies. If you are
not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
email in error and that any use, dissemination, printing, forwarding or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

Please contact the sender if you have received this email in error. 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 
 
Chris Totten 
Technical Services Manager
 
028 9448 0000
www.ctechs.co.uk 
 

<<image/jpeg>>

<<image/jpeg>>

Reply via email to