Hello Chris,
 
Thanks for the feedback.
 
Yes, we are starting work on offering a SQL/Express support.  
 
Regarding this, yes, all data is stored in a single central data store and
there is a utility that allows the configuring 2 or more FTP/SSH servers to
access the same data store.  What user database will you be using?
 
The most critical for me is that both servers "see" the same set of home
folders so hopefully this is straightforward.
 
We're in the process of writing up a few scenarios using Windows Network
Load Balancer (NLB) and MSCS.  Do you know what you'll be using for the load
balancing/distribution and for the clustering?
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Totten
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 09:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?



Hi Kevin,

Apologies for the delay. We use both Oracle and SQL-Server internally so
could go for either but we prefer SQL-Server for applications that only
requires tables for logging etc, where performance is not a key, simply
because it's much easier to set-up and maintain (we have more SQLS DBA's
than Oracle).

The issues I've had are almost certainly related to the fact that I had an
earlier version of WS_FTP installed for evaluation reasons before I tried
v6.x. Despite carrying out an uninstall of that version, and contrary to
what should happen it complained that I needed to have Postgres installed as
a pre-req but didn't offer to install it for me, I had to go and source it
myself and install separately (leading to a great deal of frustration).

When I uninstalled again and "burnt the installation to the ground" by
wiping directories etc the installation of 6.0 went much smoother and as you
say I didn't have to worry too much about the fact that Postgres was there
in the background. I still would have preferred it to offer me the choice of
using either SQLS or Oracle, or better still any ADO.NET, OLEDB or ODBC data
source so I could pick my own.

I've got WS_FTP6.0 up and running, but not with any HA features as yet. The
most critical for me is that both servers "see" the same set of home folders
so hopefully this is straightforward. If I can get that sussed and confirm
very large files go up and down with no problems I'll almost certainly buy
it, it's this main problem I'm attempting to solve (w2k FTP is brain dead
when it comes to using UNC paths as homes, it works to a point but falls
over with problems when multi-GB files are used (ref
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888515) - upgrading to Windows 2003 isn't an
option for us unfortunately at present.

Regards,

Chris

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: 12 June 2007 18:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

Hello Chris,

Yes, to gain HA, we pulled out all the registry and ini file settings and
consolidated.  

the postgresql does ship and install itself as part of the installation.
it's about 12MB.  initial deployment is postgresql but subsequent releases,
based on feedback, will support sql, sql server 2005, etc.  

is your shop using oracle or sql?

bye for now,

kg

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Totten
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 13:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

I ran the installer for v6.0 but was dismayed to see that it seems to
require PostgresSQL to be installed for some whacky reason? Please tell me
that either it can use an existing SQL-Server or Oracle database, or skip
using a RDBMS altogether?

If it's a requirement why the hell doesn't it install it itself? I have
*zero* experience with PostgresSQL and don't want to have experience of
them, like many others I suspect we're Oracle or Microsoft SQL-Server only
(or IBM DB2 or something else that's actually used in the real world). 

We're a data centre hosting apps for local government, where am I going to
bung PostgresSQL, on the web server? 

Totally dismayed - can anyone else recommend a decent FTP server that works
with HA in mind and uses industry standard components? I think my evaluation
has come to an end.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: 12 June 2007 17:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

Hello Chris,

It might be worth checking out the new WS_FTP Server 6 which was designed to
have more HA aware capabilities.  You can now setup 2 or more FTP (or SSH)
servers and have they utilize the same database for accessing host, group,
user, notification information.

Here's some REALLY high level information on it.


HIGH-AVAILABILITY ARCHITECTURE


.  NEW & Industry-leading:  Utilize the high availability architecture to
distribute workload and balance among multiple servers for improved
performance 

.  NEW & Industry-leading:  Clustering architecture enables grouping of
multiple servers together to obtain server redundancy and ensure high
availability 

.  Ability to configure the top level directory to point to a local or
shared network drive that can be easily covered with your company's disaster
recovery plans 

hope this helps,

kg

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Totten
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

Thanks Damon - I'm trying the mapped drive approach first but as always when
I've tried to do this it's problematic under windows to have a drive that's
mapped all of the time, even when no one is logged on. I'm trying to use a
scheduled job that runs on start-up but I think I'm running into problems
with the user I'm trying to execute the job as (a domain user with access to
the share in question).

It would all be a lot easier (hint hint Ipswich) if the Top Directory could
understand UNC paths and have a "Connect As..." button.

The share is fault tolerant, it's a DFS root on a pair of clustered servers
so everything should be safe, it's just getting WS_FTP to recognise the
central location.

I'm slightly surprised that I have to go through this pain, this reminds me
of NT4.0 days, surely someone else must be doing WS_FTP with HA in mind? If
not what are they using, perhaps I should be evaluating that product?

Frustrated (as much with Windows it has to be said),

Chris

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stella, Damon
Sent: 12 June 2007 17:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

Hi,

            I am not sure if this is the best way to achieve this, but it
sounds like you need to use a third server for the files to be housed on and
your two ftp_pro servers need access to that single file system.  So you
would Map a drive on each server with ftp_pro to that mapped drive (instead
of unc name) and install it there.  

            Now if you want all of it mirrored for fail-over including the
files this may not work for you, and I am assuming that when you create an
ftp_pro server it lets you do it on a mapped drive for the files to share
out.

            You could also try using a NFS program such as samba if regular
file sharing isn't working. 

            Another trick I use when a program doesn't like mapped drives or
unc names is to use the OLD dos command "subst" to subst to an unc name.  

I.E.   subst \\server\share <file:///\\server\share>  f:   from cmd prompt.

I don't have the server part of ftp pro so I can't test.

Damon R Stella
Operations Analyst 
COCC 
1-877-678-0444, extension 453 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Totten
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WS_FTP Forum] Top directory on UNC path - is this possible?

Hi there,

We have a pair of servers each one of which will be running WS_FTP server
(to replace the buggy Microsoft Windows 2000 FTP server that's already
there).

The FTP site FQDN will be a VIP that could be directed to either of the two
web servers. We need to set it up in such a way that both machines work with
the same set of files, so their top directory should ideally be a UNC path.

The problem is I can't seem to get WS_FTP server to recognise a UNC path -
it complains with the following error message:

"Only local fixed drives can be used for a Host's Top Directory!" (the
exclamation is a nice touch, like only a fool would want to be doing this)

Is there a way to do this, to get two or more servers to "see" the same set
of files?

TIA,

Chris

  

  _____  

Chris Totten   

Technical Services Manager

028 9448 0000
 <http://www.ctechs.co.uk/> www.ctechs.co.uk 

 Consilium Logo <http://www.consiliumontap.com/images/ctechslogo.jpg> 


This email and all attachments it may contain is confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Consilium Technologies. If you are
not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
email in error and that any use, dissemination, printing, forwarding or
copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

Please contact the sender if you have received this email in error.


--

*** This message originates from COCC, Inc.

Under no circumstances should non-public customer information (NPCI) be
transmitted via unsecured email. For your protection and that of your
customer, member or end product consumer do not include account numbers,
social security numbers, passwords or any other NPCI in email messages sent
to COCC, Inc. 

If the reader of this message, regardless of the address or routing, is not
an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error and any review; use, distribution, dissemination or
copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please delete this e-mail and all files transmitted with it from your system
and immediately notify COCC, Inc. by sending reply e-mail to the sender of
this message. 

Thank you. ***

  

  _____  

Chris Totten   

Technical Services Manager

028 9448 0000
 <http://www.ctechs.co.uk/> www.ctechs.co.uk 

 Consilium Logo <http://www.consiliumontap.com/images/ctechslogo.jpg> 

  

  _____  

Chris Totten   

Technical Services Manager

028 9448 0000
 <http://www.ctechs.co.uk/> www.ctechs.co.uk 

 Consilium Logo <http://www.consiliumontap.com/images/ctechslogo.jpg> 

  
  _____  

Chris Totten   
Technical Services Manager

 
028 9448 0000
 <http://www.ctechs.co.uk/> www.ctechs.co.uk 
 
 Consilium Logo <http://www.consiliumontap.com/images/ctechslogo.jpg> 

Reply via email to