I'm probably missing something here (so just ignore this post), but what
about a containing div with positioning relative, and then position your
boxes within this div. Your text inside is positioned absolutely from
the bottom of the containing box.

        <style type="text/css">
        #sectionheader
                        {
                        position:relative;
                        }
                        
        #box1, #box2, #box3     
                        {
                        position:absolute;
                        display:inline;
                        margin:10px;
                        height:100px;
                        width:100px;
                        border:1px solid #666;
                        }
        #box2   {
                        left:110px
                        }
        #box3   {
                        left:220px
                        }
        .bottom_text
                        {
                        position:absolute;
                        bottom:0px;
                        margin:10px;
                        }
        
        </style>
</head>

<body>
<div id="sectionheader">
<div id="box1"><p class="bottom_text">some text</p></div>
<div id="box2"><p class="bottom_text">more text</p></div>
<div id="box3"><p class="bottom_text">more text</p></div>
</div>

It would be more elegant with display:inline for the boxes, but that
caused problems for Opera (don't know why!??).

James
-----Original Message-----
From: George Karabelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2003 7:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG]Vertically aligned text without tables


hi everyone,

Time to stop lurking.

We have recently converted our corporate site (http://hww.com.au) from a
table based layout to (almost) pure CSS. Unfortunately I have had to use
a table to align text to the bottom of a box. See:
http://hww.com.au/syndication/ (the 3 boxes below the header and above
the content id="subHeading")

Can this be achieved without tables? 

cheers,
George

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 



*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to