Thanks Russ, link has some useful points for where to start.  A daunting task, but 
hopefully 99% achievable!

-----Original Message-----
From: russ weakley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] Preparing for DOCTYPE


Miles,

I'd start with a safe option and go for HTML 4.01 transitional. It is easy
to achieve and reliable. We've discussed XHTML doctypes and the issues at
length on the list recently so no point going over that.

I did a quick site validation forcing character encoding (also missing) and
setting it to HTML 4.01:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edna.edu.au%2Fedna%2Fpage
1.html&charset=iso-8859-1+%28Western+Europe%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Transitiona
l
While the errors look daunting, there is a lot of global replacing that
could solve a chunk of this stuff.

There is a small article that may help on getting your site valid here:
http://webboy.net/presentation/validation.cfm

Russ


> 
> The live version is www.edna.edu.au, but this currently has no DOCTYPE.
> However I am testing different DOCTYPEs internally on a version of the site
> templates that have had a lot of issues fixed.
> 
> I have been instructed to apply as many Priority 1 and 2 accessibility
> requirements as possible, and let me tell you it's not going to be easy as the
> site design seems as though it was built for eye candy rather than usability!
> However I'd like to try and at least get the existing design somewhat
> accessible before I convince them a redesign is a good idea...
> 
> Miles.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WSG] Preparing for DOCTYPE
> 
> 
> 
> Post a link to the list!
>

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************

Reply via email to