I think strong & em will be merged but <em> in particular does have semantic
meaning (rather than presentational).
<em>These</em> slugs are delicious.
These slugs are <em>delicious</em>.
Last time I paid attention (which was months ago) They were talking about
use <section> & <heading> elements to mark up content blocks.
For example:
<section>
<heading>This is kinda like an H1</heading>
<p>Other content in here</p>
<section>
<heading>This is kinda like an H2</heading>
<p>Other content in here</p>
</section>
<section>
<heading>This is kinda like an H2</heading>
<p>Other content in here</p>
</section>
</section>
This would replace the h1->h7 (thank god) and would also address the
breaking up of content into sections & subsections using a similar concept
to nested lists. See the block text module
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xhtml2-20030506/mod-block-text.html#s_block-tex
tmodule for further details.
Ackkkkk <hr> is still there!!! But there is a comment about removing or
renaming it to <separator/>.
The inline text module is also kind of interesting -
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xhtml2-20030506/mod-inline-text.html#sec_9.7.
Cheers
Mark
------------------
Mark Stanton
Technical Director
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201
Fax: 9956 8433
http://www.gruden.com
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************