Re: [WSG] z-indexing

Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:04:56 -0800

Hi

Flash will always come to the top as in the link below although this is not due to the Active-x i-ness of the plugin (Flash is only an ActiveX control for IE for Windows - see the object tag discussion at that xml.com link I posted last week).

Have you tried using the <object> only Satay code (i.e not Embed) - works ok on all modern browsers?

Also, presented text in an html document is not selectable when a Flash movie is over the top and wmode is transparent in Netscape Plugin API based browsers (wmode will work on all browsers with plugin 6.0r65 (41?) or greater.)
Clicking a form text  input in IE when a Flash movie is overlayed will cause the viewport to turn #000 and myself to say ####.

HTH
James


Phillips, Wendy wrote:
Flash will always come to the top as it is an activeX object

you can use the wmode parameter but that is not supported in all browsers

http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/ts/documents/flash_top_layer.htm

WP

Wendy Phillips
Job Ready (Learning & Development) 
Customer Sales & Service


  
-----Original Message-----
From:	Simon Jessey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:	Monday, 2 February 2004 12:01 pm
To:	WSG
Subject:	[WSG] <object> z-indexing


Hey, all.

Does anyone have any good experience with controlling the z-index of
objects? I am trying to implement something where an object (in this case,
some Flash) that is absolutely-positioned with respect to the viewport (with
position: fixed) can have content pass both over it and under it. My
experiments have yielded rendering problems in most common browsers. Here is
an example:

http://jessey.net/tests/z-object.html

I have hidden the fixed positioning from Internet Explorer, but it should
still respect the z-index values.


Simon Jessey
----------------------------------
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blog: http://jessey.net/blog/
work: http://keystonewebsites.com/

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 
    
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

  
***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************

Reply via email to