Yeah, could be that I am a bit stuffed :-)
I will just have to make the two images as skinny as I can and hope that
no-one is viewing under 640x480...
ps that min-width worked a treat in Mozilla :-)
Thanks
James
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:26, Lindsay Evans wrote:
> James Cowperthwaite wrote:
> > Ah yes, but the effect that I am going for is to have one image sits
> > flush left, while the other is flush right... They get closer and
> > closer as the browser gets smaller.
> >
> > This works fine until the browser until the browser window gets too
> > small, which is really only an issue (in this case) if the user has a
> > small viewport.
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be any 'nowrap' equiv I guess.
>
> You could try:
>
> <style...>
> #logos {
> width: 100%;
> min-width: 800px;
> }
> .logo1 {...}
> .logo2 {...}
> </style>
>
> <div id="logos">
> <div class="logo1">...</div>
> <div class="logo2">...</div>
> </div>
>
> Although IE will ignore the min-width.
>
> You could throw a div with a width of 800px in there instead of the
> min-width, but that seems a bit too much like a hack for my taste :)
>
> --
> Lindsay Evans.
> Developer,
> Red Square Productions.
>
> [p] 8596.4000
> [f] 8596.4001
> [w] www.redsquare.com.au
>
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> *****************************************************
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************
