You could even cut the processing down too, by limiting the page
load to a certain number of characters… I mean you don’t need the whole source… But still – that’s the code, and im sure it would work
(I didn’t test it, just wrote it up in outlook)… ----------------------------- Chris Stratford ----------------------------- -----Original
Message-----
Well to code it in PHP
would be very easy, here is the code: (Change TICK.JPG to the
location of the TICK image, and same for CROSS.JPG) save that script to:
validate.php then link this image: <img
src="" border=”0”> CODE: <? $fd=fopen("http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=$HTTP_REFERER"
","r"); while ($line=fgets($fd,1000)) { $alltext .= $line; } fclose ($fd); if (strpos($alltext, '<h2
id="result" class="valid">')) { header("Location:
TICK.JPG"); }else{ header("Location:
CROSS.JPG"); } ?> ----------------------------- Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.neester.com ----------------------------- -----Original Message----- I think you're semi-onto something Chris,
and it actually wouldn't be all that hard to make it yourself if you were really
keen - you could have a script on your own site which takes the URL value of
the page, passes it directly to the validator (via the querystring) and then
parses the result page for keywords (i.e. 'is valid' or whatever is says when
your page validates) and then display the appropriate image. As you've mentioned tho - it will mean that
every page that uses it will be validated every time it's loaded, unless
some sort of caching system is implemented in parallel. You *might* be able to do something
'cache-y' by relying on the 'Last Modified:' header that a lot of servers
use, so if it hasn't been modified, then load a previous state for the icon,
otherwise validate and display the result. The problem here again is that you
have all this required communication going back and forth just to
display a little icon :) It'd definitely be a nice feature if you
could download and install the validation engine on your own server, and
run the tests locally! Cheers (now you've got me thinking...) Beau Chris Stratford said: > You know, I have been wondering why
W3C don't change their CSS & > HTML/XHTML validators so that they
work like this: > > You add the image to your website: > > <img
src="" border="0"> > > that PHP link will validate your
website via the REFERRER value in PHP. > then the PHP script should return the
image! > Now if it validated - the image should
be the TICK, and if it didn't > validate, it should be an X. > > I know the obvious disadvantage - it
would use a lot more processing > than it does already. > But I am sure they could implement
some sort of Caching checksum, so > that when that specific referrer has a
diff checksum or whatnot it > rescans. > It would also delay the image load for
a few seconds - but that's > acceptable. > > The advantage would be that its
instant validation without opening a new > window. > And if its an X you can click to see
the errors. > > Maybe the Processing it would require
is way too much - but its an idea! > > What do you think. > > ----------------------------- > Chris Stratford >
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.neester.com
<http://www.neester.com/> > ----------------------------- > > -- Beau Lebens Information Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dented Reality - www.dentedreality.com.au Information Architecture, Usability, Web
Development ***************************************************** The discussion list for
http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *****************************************************
|
- [WSG] W3C VALIDATORS Chris Stratford
- RE: [WSG] W3C VALIDATORS Mark Stanton
- Re: [WSG] W3C VALIDATORS Beau
- RE: [WSG] W3C VALIDATORS Chris Stratford
- Chris Stratford