Hi Chris.... I thought that was really really funny and so did everyone else
in the office.

in fact its going to join the other quotes I have printed out and stuck on
the wall  that we read when we need to raise a smile in times of stress.


Jackie Reid
Mock Orange Web Site Development
1st Floor
92 Victoria Street
MACKAY Q 4740
Ph: 07 4953 4035

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Blown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Friday Afternoon Funny


>
> Of course James, I know that for sure, just thought it was a funny way
> of putting it.. the paragraph is under 500px wide anyway
>
> I've tried to read without moving my eyes and its pretty hard.. ;)
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 17:23, James Ellis wrote:
> > Hi Chris
> >
> > This is an important point they have raised - they are looking at
> > peripheral vision. We see a circle of about 6cm on screen in one go -
> > anything larger we have to move our eyes to take in more. This is why
> > newspapers tend to be in columns etc etc.
> >
> > The Zed man has some good writeups on how ~430px (whats the em?)  is
> > about the right line length - @ alistapart although where it is I don't
> > know as the search function has disappeared from that site.
> >
> > Cheers
> > James
> >
> >
> > Chris Blown wrote:
> >
> > >Thought I'd share this one with everyone, we received a list of
> > >corrections today from one of our clients, and we found a particularly
> > >humorous snippet. This correction was given in relation to paragraph
> > >line length.
> > >
> > >"It makes it hard for people to read if they have to keep moving their
> > >eyes"
> > >
> > >LOL!
> > >
> > >Cheers
> > >Chris Blown
> > >
> > >*****************************************************
> > >The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > >*****************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > *****************************************************
> > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> > *****************************************************
> >
> >
> >
>
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> *****************************************************
>
>

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to