Doh stupid me. And I just change my email for the list so WSG won't get all
jumbled up with the other lists. lol

Thanks for the tips still ;)
 
With Regards
Jaime Wong
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03/11/04 04:47:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Purpose of this mailing list
 
The only downside is that mailing list is that it is hard to organise it to
specific folders. I have a folder for WSG but 90% of the mail ended up in my
inbox instead because the "from field" is actually using the sender's name. 
 
Thats when you base your rule on the TO: field ;-))
 
All the messages here go into the right folder..
 
 
Taco Fleur
Blog http://www.tacofleur.com/index/blog/
Methodology http://www.tacofleur.com/index/methodology/
 
Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Teach me and I will learn 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jaime Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2004 3:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Purpose of this mailing list
 
 
I think I am a lil late to contribute here but I would like to say that I
agree with Justin. Forums are a good tool for organising topics but for some
who are too busy to take the trouble to log into forums and check the posts,
it is a turn off. 
 
I would prefer for the list to remain as it is now. At least I can take my
time to read the mails when I have the time to do it.
 
The only downside is that mailing list is that it is hard to organise it to
specific folders. I have a folder for WSG but 90% of the mail ended up in my
inbox instead because the "from field" is actually using the sender's name. 
 
About having different categories of topics, I would go for it only if I am
sure that those mails would go to the folders I specify..If not, it would be
too confusing for me and I would not know where to start reading from.
 
Lastly I want to say that I love WSG! People are helpful and although it is
not a huge list, it doesn't matter. What matters most is the
culture/attitude behind the list members. 
 
That is the only thing that makes me stay in the list and not to be
shy/afraid to show my dumb side when it comes to issue I am unsure of.
 
In fact, I would say that WSG has the best attitude so far compared to other
lists. To Russ and Peter...you guys did a great job in maintaining the
spirit!
 
 
With Regards
Jaime Wong
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03/10/04 11:59:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Purpose of this mailing list
 
On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 02:21 PM, Paul Ross wrote:
 
> Having said that - when we get to 1,000 members I guess something will
> have to
> be done or the success of the list could implode in on itself and the
> noise
> traffic become too much to handle. I would suggest that you think of
> switching
> to a forum based website much like the excellent
> http://forums.australianinfront.com.au/Default.aspx
 
As soon as lists move to forums, I stop posting, stop reading, and stop
helping, as do many others. Web browser-based discussion lists are
difficult, slow and tedious at the best of times, which is the complete
opposite of mail and news groups, which were *designed especially* for
threading, replies and message based discussion.
 
Everything related to discussion happens faster and easier with a mail
client than it does with a browser.
 
Browser-based discussion has one positive; that being the fact that new
subscribers can read old posts and search for topics before posting.
This of course can easily be overcome with web-based archives of email
lists (which is common anyway).
 
---
Justin French
http://indent.com.au
 
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************
.
 
 
 
 

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to