Jackie Reid blurted out:
Manuel Gonzlez Noriega wrote:
b) doesn't work well for multi-paragraph questions or answers.
scuse my ignorance but is it not ok to this: <dl><dt>first bit</dt> <dt>next bit</dt> <dd>first bit</dd> <dd>next bit</dd> <dd>and another bit</dd></dl>
While that would be fine, I personally would prefer: <dl> <dt> <p>first bit</p> <p>next bit</p> </dt> <dd> <p>first bit</p> <p>next bit</p> <p>and another bit</p> </dd> </dl>
I prefer this because doing it in the form of multiple <dt>s or <dd>s in a row loses a bit of the cohesiveness of the back-and-forth nature of a conversation. Mostly it is a matter of taste.
I also really liked the way that Lea mentioned. I didn't think about doing it that way, but it seems really natural.
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*****************************************************
