> Neerav wrote: > > So now im comfortable using XHTML 1.0 transitional how hard would moving > to 1.0 strict and then onto 1.1 be?
The move from transitional to strict you wont find hard. This list of tags shows what is and isn't allowed in XHTML 1.0 strict, I do not know of any browser quirks cause by the strict doctype. http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_reference.asp While XHTML 1.0 *may* be served as text/html, XHTML 1.1 *must* be served as application/xhtml+xml. This creates major problems for IE as it only accepts text/html mime. http://keystonewebsites.com/articles/mime_type.php Furthur Reference for XHTML 1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/ I may be wrong, but I don't think there is any need to have your average website using XHTML 1.1 doctype. Regards Jason Turnbul ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
