Am 15.05.2004 um 20:36 schrieb Peter A. Shevtsov:
Michael Zeltner wrote:
but hey, you could do that with accessible flash, that would be cleaner :)
Hey! You force visitors to install Flash player. But someone can't do that because their internal company policy, or they just don't know how to do it.
i don't force anybody to do anything: accessible flash means, alternative content *and* (in case you didn't know they exists) using flashs accessibility features (http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/accessibility/features/flash/).
I think that image maps are more accessible.
they are, but i didn't say more accessible. clean (as in semantically correct) was what i meant. the problem is, if someone has an old screenreader and flash installed, he won't get the flash features, and no alternative content.
What do you mean by "accessibe flash" apropos?
see above.
regards, michael -- Michael Zeltner Netalley Networks LLP http://www.netalleynetworks.com/
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
