John, It is always best to avoid any sort of hack. There is always a way around a hack, if that be by adding an extra div. or changing your menu layout. Hacks are *last resort* methods to create a layout. I think a list of _standard hacks_ would just promote the use of hacks, where they are not needed. That list would become abused - well thats a guess - by newbies to XHTML and CSS... and it would lead to the same issues we have now - with inaccessability and validation. my 2 cents, chris stratford J4Web wrote: Hello |
- [WSG] Standard Hacks? J4Web
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Chris Stratford
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Nick Lo
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Mordechai Peller
- RE: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Kay Smoljak
- RE: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Chris Blown
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Mark Stanton
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Rick Faaberg
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? J4Web
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? russ - maxdesign
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? Mark Harwood
- Re: [WSG] Standard Hacks? scott parsons