Hello, Just as there are ways to create hackfree markup and css, there are ways to satisfy Bobby. Usually by the time one has done it, one has come up with a better page. Using Bobby has probably been the one thing that helped me to learn to appreciate the value of well structured markup. I learned more about standards and accessibility there than I can ever expect to here.
In fact, I would have to say that I much prefer Bobby, with its tight-lipped, pitiless scrutiny. At least one can expect some kind of a clue as to which direction to turn. Whatsmore, if one disagrees with Bobby, one may write to Watchfire and raise one's objections. The folks there actually DO reply. I know this from experience. What may one come to expect from the WSG list? http://www.fuckinggoogleit.com. Real cute. Cheers, Roy Nancy Johnson wrote: Dear Group, I've come to use Bobby for one reason and that is insuring that all images have alt tags. I manage a website or at least try to where too many people have the ability to add content and unfortunately other items to our website. In my opinion the comments pages that come up are too cumbersome and many comments do not address issues on my page but possible issues or they are incorrect. It has also called me on a linking issue where one word out of three was the same to describe two different links and told me I shouldn't use the same description to describe different links. Nancy Johnson ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
