I'll check it out for you when I get home later this evening. -- tim
Quoting Neerav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Tim > > You're right, the different colouring was there just for separation. I > like your idea of using spacing to differentiate groups of links and > have applied it at http://www.algae.info/ > > Works fine in Firefox 0.8/Mozilla , Opera 7.23, and Safari 1.2 > > Unfortunately IE wont come to the party, it puts in vertical spacing > between each <li> in the <ul> when all the other browsers play nice and > display them vertically flush. > > -- > Neerav Bhatt > http://www.bhatt.id.au > Web Development & IT consultancy > Mobile: +61 403 8000 27 > > http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav > > Tim Lucas wrote: > > Well assuming the different colouring is there just for separation then > > it is much harder for the brain to deduce groupings from colours than it > > is for proximity. Its just a graphic design principle that I think might > > be worth trying. > > > > To fix your prob set the width to be 100% on the <a>'s. > > > > Try these style changes (just add to page or bottom of style sheet): > > > <snipped> > > -- tim > > > > > > Neerav spoke the following wise words on 14/06/2004 6:36 PM EST: > > > >> Any specific reason Tim ? The clients for that site want a solid > >> colour background for the nav column > ***************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ***************************************************** > > www.toolmantim.com ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
