There's two schools of thought:

1) navigation first, content second, with a "skip to the content" link
2) content first, navigation second, with a "skip to the navigation" link

It's often argued that 2) is better for SEO, as it "top-loads" your documents,
putting your relevant content fairly high up in the document - which some
search engines give extra brownie points for.

What you do is really up to you, though. Just be consistent in your
choice.

The comparison with the index of a book works...to a point. For instance,
you don't have the complete index on every single page, or at the beginning
of every single chapter, of the book...

My GBP0.02 on the matter, anyway,

Patrick
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nico Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2004 14:32
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WSG] Accessibililty and the positioning of navigation
> 
> 
> I am about to start teaching a web development course to a group of
> teenagers and would like to clarify something in my mind before I
> mislead them.
> 
> In short, I am unhappy with the theory behind placement of navigation
> at the end of documents.
> 
> As I understand it, the idea of placing navigation at the end of the
> document flow is that when the page is viewed by JAWS or other
> "disability" browsers the user wants to get straight into the content
> of the page rather than wade through the navigation first. Hence the
> designer places the code so that with CSS it can be aboslutely
> positioned but without it is below the main content of the page.
> 
> I'm not sure I agree. Surely when you read a book, whether you are
> disabled or otherwise, the contents page is one of the first things
> you come to. It enables you to find the part of the book you wish to
> read first. Is the same not true of web sites? If I follow a link to a
> site I've not been to before I often look for the "about" link first,
> to find out more about what I am reading. I certainly wouldn't want to
> wade through the whole of the home page in order to get to the
> navigation.
> 
> Can someone clarify this for me?
> 
> Nico
> *****************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ***************************************************** 
> 
> 
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************

Reply via email to