Hi James I personally find that Cynthia is a better "automated tool" than Bobby - and it certainly helps you find & fix up errors quicker, although I still really prefer to do accessibility testing myself by using Jaws & Lynx.
Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Cowperthwaite Sent: Thursday, 24 June 2004 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] Accessability testing Hi - does anyone still use Bobby these days? I ask because we really have only used: CynthiaT Says - Web Content Accessibility Report (http://www.contentquality.com/) On a site we are developing we pass all Checklist items up to and including Priority 3 Verification with Cynthia, however our client is testing using Bobby and Usablenet, stating these are the 'industry standard'. Is this the case? If not could anyone hit me with a nice list objective comparison? Thanks James -- James Cowperthwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ***************************************************** ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
