And make the LINKS, BLOCK ELEMENTS - without using <ul>'s.
Without the stylesheet, the links will bunch up without any spaces or gaps.
So you use a <ul> and <li>'s - just for the fact that it will be backwards compatable with browsers which dont support CSS, and also its just better formatted when you view your code... - thats my opinion...
:)
Ted Drake wrote:
<ol> gives your links the number 1, 2, 3, etc.
On this line, how do I change it to A, B, C, a, b, c, etc. Ted
-----Original Message----- From: ckimedia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] As Good As the Weakest Link
Hi,
When styling a group of links one can simply change the display of the a:link and a:visited state to display block, making a simply line of links into a list. What is the advantage of using a <ol> for links as opposed to the aforementioned, if any?
#navbar a:link, #navbar a:visited { display: block; color: #7e7e7e; background-color: #ffffff; border-bottom: solid 1px #000000; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-top: 3px; }
"Complexity is good, complicated is bad." —Paolo Soleri
Chris
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
