Marco della Pina:
>Internet Explorer 6 (Windows) (only!) in "Standard Mode" has a bug in
>its rendering engine, i.e. the CSS-Definition "width: 200px;" is wider
>for an input field than for a select box.

Mariusz Stankiewicz
>In FireFox .8 the two fields appear different in length on both quirks
>on and off.

This is not really a CSS bug, I think, more a difficulty surrounding the rendering of 
form controls.

As is well known, unstyled form controls are drawn by browsers using the underlying OS 
settings. This includes features like the arrow on the right of a select box and the 
way a form button changes when it is "pressed". In the example, only the width value 
was set by CSS. It could be that if padding, border and margin values are set (let's 
say to zero) the widths of the different form controls may be the same - or at least a 
bit closer ;)

Owen

-----Original Message-----
From: Mariusz Stankiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 July 2004 10:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] text field size tag


In FireFox .8 the two fields appear different in length on both quirks 
on and off.

marco della pina wrote:

>Ted Drake wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'm wondering if anyone has any more concrete opinions on the 
>>practice of defining width of input and select fields with 
>>css instead of the size attribute.
>>    
>>
>
>There is a big problem with defining the width of input and select
>fields over CSS:
>
>Internet Explorer 6 (Windows) (only!) in "Standard Mode" has a bug in
>its rendering engine, i.e. the CSS-Definition "width: 200px;" is wider
>for an input field than for a select box.
>
>I wrote a small example on http://www.mdpnet.de/css-width/
>
>So far, I found no solution on this problem. Does anybody else?
>
>Greetings from Germany,
>
>Marco
>*****************************************************
>The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>***************************************************** 
>
>
>  
>
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally 
privileged.  It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it 
is addressed and others authorised to receive it.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disclose, copy, distribute or take action on the contents of 
this information, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee.  Any 
unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received 
this email in error please notify the sender by email immediately and delete the 
message from your computer.

ECOTEC Research & Consulting Limited
Registered in England No. 1650169 Registered Office:
Priestley House, 28-34 Albert Street, Birmingham, B4 7UD, UK
Tel: +44 (0)121 616 3600
http://www.ecotec.com
________________________________________________________________________
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************

Reply via email to