I would discourage anyone from keeping with old mark-up habits where tags are left open. It is a legacy from browsers that ignored such semantics. Don't count on a browsers 'interpretation' of the DOM to get it right, feed the browser good code and it will reward you in the long run.
It's lazy, it's 1994, don't do it!
Peter Goddard
Web Developer/IT
PSI Global Ltd
-----Original Message-----
From: Parker Torrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 October 2004 01:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] OL or UL? Itīs rigth?
Yes you can
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/lists.html
section 10.2
see DEPRECATED EXAMPLE:
~parker
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 05:46:20 +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marky,
>
> > My friend is asking me if i can use tags
> >
> > <ul>
> > <ol></ol>
> > </ul>
>
> No, you can't. Unordered lists can only have list items as child
> elements.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew Taumoefolau
>
>
>
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
>
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
