Paul Novitski wrote:
At 12:05 PM 10/6/2004, john wrote:

Why not just put <a name="content"></a> at the top of the page?

Probably because it doesn't look or feel (from a markup point of view) like an elegant, modern solution.


Some browsers don't appear to need a corresponding named anchor if the link is to "#top".

As far as I can tell, every modern browser (greater than generation 4) can handle "fragment identifiers" (i.e. linking to a certain element with a specific ID, rather than using named anchors). Even the later versions of Lynx support it.


Patrick
_____________________________________________________
re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to