Unfortunately in the Mac world, if you run Jaguar and want to use Safari, it has to be v1.0, as anything newer requires Panther (very Microsoft of Apple there, IMHO). Of course, that doesn't prevent people from running Camino, Firefox et al on Jaguar, but you can't expect a non-technical audience to know or understand that. So, I'd say that most average Jaguar users will still be using either IE5 or Safari 1.0, and the proportion of Mac users lumbered with Safari 1.0 could well be more than 'microscopic'. (There are many older Macs out there that can run OS X to Jaguar level, but not beyond).
But you're right, it shouldn't even exist ... Cheers, Kevin Futter On 8/10/04 1:07 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Safari 1.0 has got to be a unbelievably microscopic audience, if it > exists at all. That version should never have seen the light of day > (like NS6), and IMHO not worried about. > > FWIW > > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > Tom Livingston > Senior Multimedia Artist > mlinc.com > > Get FireFox > http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=1 > > > > On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Nick Gleitzman wrote: > >> js dropdowns in Safari 1.0 render in the wrong place - relative to >> 0,0 (I think) - in any case, unusable. > > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
