Here's a link to an article that convinced me the Websafe colour palette sits alongside Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster ...
http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/00/37/index2a.html?tw=design Cheers, Kevin Futter On 21/10/04 4:49 PM, "Neerav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?method=and&format=short&config=ws > g_webstandardsgroup_org&restrict=&exclude=&words=Web+safe+colours+-+still+rele > vent > will answer our question > > Neerav Bhatt > http://www.bhatt.id.au > Web Development & IT consultancy > > http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts > http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav > > Andreas Boehmer wrote: >> Out of curiosity: what's your stand to the 216 web colours? Do you stick >> with them or do you go the full 16 bits? >> >> I personally have stopped limiting myself a long time ago (unless >> absolutely necessary), but keep coming across articles warning me from >> doing so. >> >> What's your thoughts? >> >> >> >> Andreas Boehmer >> User Experience Consultant >> >> Phone: (03) 9417 0468 >> Mobile: (0411) 097 038 >> http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au >> Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development >> ****************************************************** >> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ >> >> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm >> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help >> ****************************************************** > ****************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ****************************************************** > > ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
