Sorry Patrick,
Yes I was stating the image is a data object which comprised of many individual
characteristics (data definitions), sorta XML stylie.
I was also suggesting that "Phone number" was not necessarily attached to the address,
but definitely attached to the image.
<dl>
<dt><img ... alt="image of house" /></dt>
<dd><address>Physical address</address></dd>
<dd>Phone number</dd>
...
</dl>
Am I incorrect in this belief?
mike 2k:)2
<marquee><blink>
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
site: http://www.webSemantics.co.uk
</marquee></blink>
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 October 2004 14:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mike Foskett
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] How-to: Create a list with pictures / detail?
Quoting Mike Foskett
> Try a definition list.
>
> <dl>
> <dt><img /></dt>
> <dd>address 1</dd>
> <dd>Phone number</dd>
> ...
> </dl>
Not too sure about this, as the multiple DDs would imply separate, independent
definitions that all refer to the image (whereas an address needs to be grouped
together, and each lines is not independent from the other lines.
Patrick H. Lauke
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
