Richard Czeiger wrote: > Can't find any reference to this little pecularity on the web... > OK. So I learned that it's better to use numbers rather than em's or % > as numbers are inherited. > BUT! Whenever i have my line-height set to 1.4 (or 140% or 1.4em for > that matter), all the underlines of my links get squished to the > text-bottom by 1 pixel. I know this sounds ridiculously finnicky but > it can make them more difficult to read. > OK - a concession: this ONLY seams to happen in IE5. Unfortunately, > that what my client's are running and will be viewing my nice little > Intranet on.
Then you need to sell them on the urgent need to replace IE5, which is a security hazard that should be deemed unacceptable: http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/713878 > You can check out examples here: > http://www.vfme.com/images/firefox.gif > http://www.vfme.com/images/ie50.gif > Has anyone else heard of this microscopicly small little quirk? Can't be sure, because you provide no URL, but it appears you're pointing out mousetype links. Switch to a readable size and the problem is likely to become inconsequential. -- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." U.S. Constitution, Amendment 1 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************