I find the inconsistant use of thumbnails in the category div 's (watercolors, etc.) that are href's that change a picture and then the same sized thumbnails in the left and right containers with the border frame being the only visible dif, yet they aren't clickable confusing and not very usable. They seem to add no value to the page and are misleading because you assume that all the thumbnails that size are clickable.
Visually I had problems trying to figure out why some of the right nav links are indented and some aren't. They don't appear to be sub-sections, since all pages are off of home, nor are they strictly "genre" since biography is included. Since indentation is a visual tool, not really a design effect it also seems a little misleading I do like the nice way the main images of each section are framed nicely and draw the eye. I think this would be visiually enhanced if you didn't have the thimbnails mentioned above to distract from this pleasant, simple yet elegant look. Of course this is all just personal opinion :>) -- Susan R. Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
