i assume he's using win32 to describe the platform that win95+ applications run on.
scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Lo Sent: Friday, 12 November 2004 10:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy: http://www.scottschiller.com/ I'm a Mac/Linux-on-occasion/PC-only-when-I-have-to user so I could be wrong but: <!-- SCOTTSCHILLER V4.04: Now with more funk. --> <!-- --> <!-- This code may contain questionable ECMA- --> <!-- script practices. Particularly in terms --> <!-- of object-oriented, event-driven, hacked --> <!-- recursive animation script. May crash IE --> <!-- on win32, so watch out. --> <!-- --> <!-- scott (scottschiller.com) - 20040612 --> Indicates Win32 which I thought referred to earlier versions of the Windows platform and therefore includes browsers less and less in the majority? Nick > yes, true... but i was thinking in terms of browser share, for the > developer says in his code-comments that his site crashes IE-based > browsers. not something that would appeal to the most of the wider > market, eh. > > s. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
