The best way to work around this is to make a fluid layout.
Somethings will always not fit with your design.
But the user would be more than used to websites breaking if they constantly need massive text on screen...


designer wrote:

Hi All,

I joined this group a couple of weeks ago and already have learnt lots of
stuff. But, like all new folk to xhtml/css, I'm struggling to accept some of
it.  I've used CSS for a couple of years now, but only recently have moved
to full CSS (no tables etc). The thing that worries me most is
accessibility - I love pixels as units of dimensions. In my
ignorance/innocence, I used to sit complacent with a design, thinking that
because I'd used pixels as my units it was safe from those people who wanted
to view 'text size largest' or whatever, and that the innate construction of
my site was safe.  However, since I started to use Firefox (and Mozilla) I
see that my designs can be wrecked in seconds by someone zooming the text
size. (Which IE6 won't do). I love Firefox, but to my (learning) eye, this
text zoom is BAD!  No, I'm not being inconsiderate to folk with visual
problems - Opera has a beautiful zoom feature which simply magnifies
everything and keeps the design intact, so isn't that the way browsers
should be going, instead of just acting on the text?

Clearly, the use of ems is just a nightmare, esp when you have several
images and have to guess what the em dimensions are, so what's wrong with
'complete zoom' instead of 'text zoom'?

Let me stress, I'm <em>not </em> being arrogant or inconsiderate  - I'm
learning. I don't grasp the reasoning behind this and I can't find anything
that explains the philosophy of this approach. So I'm asking the question.

Thanks,

Bob (McClelland)
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************








--
------------------------
Chris Stratford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neester.com
------------------------

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to