Mark Harwood
Remeber to put onKeypress too

I'd disagree. I've had this rant before, but here goes: onclick is not a device specific handler. Onclick is also activated by the keyboard (e.g. hitting return when focus is on a link). It's a misnomer, and should really be "onactivation" or something. True, very old browsers may have only had onclick triggered by the mouse, but these are very rare. In addition, if somebody *was* using something like Netscape 4 and only using the keyboard, with this method they'd still get to the linked document, just that it won't pop up (as NN4.x is one of those that don't consider the keyboard to give off onclick events). So, accessibility wise, you're covered.


Adding onkeypress can actually do more harm than good. Firefox (and I think Mozilla as well) *correctly* interpret *all* keys as onkeypress, even the TAB key. So, having something activate onkeypress will mean that keyboard users won't be able to tab beyond that particular link.

Patrick H. Lauke
--
_____________________________________________________
re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to