Re: [WSG] Defining A Definition List

[Matthew]

Lea de Groot wrote: I'm not sure that we should use the information that 'the W3C hasn't corrected anyone on this' as confirming evidence - to my knowledge they have never corrected anyone on anything. True, they don't usually name names. They have to be diplomatic but they occasionally talk about specific products. Eg, Which browsers accept the media type application/xhtml+xml? Browsers known to us include all Mozilla-based browsers, such as Mozilla, Netscape 5 and higher, Galeon and Firefox, as well as Opera, Amaya, Camino, Chimera, DocZilla, iCab, Safari, and all browsers on mobile phones that accept WAP2. In fact, any modern browser. [...] Does Microsoft Internet Explorer accept the media type application/xhtml+xml? No. [...] On http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/ they point out incorrect implementations. But yeah, they usually talk in abstract about common mistakes, Eg, http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/ .Matthew Cruickshank http://holloway.co.nz/