Chris Stratford wrote:
1)
Printing IGNORES all "background" attributes...
This is understandable - but I didn't realise this until just now...
So my LI background elements weren't printing (or showing in Print Preview which is how I check what it looks like)
A small consolation: you can set your browser to print background colours and images. But yes, out of the box, these will indeed not be printed.
2)
FireFox Ignores Custom LI background elements (the proper method with: list-style-image: url(../media/ul_li_point.gif); - not using a background image)
This is very annoying, because basically if you want to include the custom element in a print now - I need to put the image inside the <li>...
This must be a bug or a mistake on Moz's behalf??
IE will print the background LI element - which is good!
I think that is the way it should be?
Or is there a reason why Moz has done this?
This is only a stricter enforcement of 1). It's a bit schizophrenic of IE to give
users the option not to print background colours and images, but then
happily still doing it for things like LI. In my mind FF is correct here.
-- Patrick H. Lauke _____________________________________________________ re�dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
