>>You have to avoid building your code on top of some IE bug/quirk. The only bug/quirk with IE that I've come across that needed my attention was the big one: box model. I prefer to use the "box in a box" sort of workaround, rather than tantek, SBMH, modified SBMH or alternate BMHs, simply because I don't see the "box in a box" method as being a hack, per se. Other than that, the small things like the lack of :hover tag support, etc. I can live without those particular effects.
>>This guarantees that code for all browsers is standards-compiliant >>and invalid junk is only served to IEnvalid junk. Why serve any junk at all? It is entirely possible to create fully standards compliant, visually striking pages without using hacks, extra scripting or any other sort of method. Csszengarden is the only example you need of that. Cheers, Collin Davis Web Architect Stromberg Architectural Products p 903.454.0904 f 903.454.3642 e [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.strombergarchitectural.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
