Steven Clark wrote:
I think you may have the wrong end of the stick on what the initial post was about. Someone wanted to point out that a site was badly made and another suggested the sending of this document. All I am suggesting is that in that circumstance it is neither professional nor in the best interest of one's cause to be abusive.So you are the one in error. In the future if you are going to start a debate type topic make sure to make your point clear. Seeing as you have created it make sure to read through all the responses and consider what people have said. Debates on etiquette are probably not particularly relevant anyway, I would advise against starting such topics.
The posting it was raised in was called:
Re: [WSG] What can you say to a site like this?
It wasn't a document I wandered across and just thought yuk, obviously. Enough said.
Steven Clark Norty Pig Web Development http://www.nortypig.com http://www.blog.nortypig.com
_________________________________________________________________
Click here for the latest chart ringtones: http://ringtones.com.au/ninemsn/control?page=/ninemsn/main.jsp
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
