On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:14:49 -0500, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:17:14 -0500, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The home page for this site has 100 HTML errors, 11 CSS errors, uses
> > inline styles, and sets the fonts in points.
> that site was not generated
> with NVU.
> This doesn't excuse their shoddy code, but I don't think it should
> reflect upon the editor.

Something that *does* reflect on the editor:
<blockquote cite="http://www.nvu.com/index.html";>
<a href="http://www.nvu.com";><img
       alt="Document made with Nvu"

As I recall, the border attribute is depreciated
 I'm yet to find a WYSIWYG editor that even vaguely conforms to
standards - not because it can't be done but because people who can
make good applications can rarely make good websites.  They utilise
depreciated attributes, tables and simiar systems because it's easier
from an application-design point of view.

* sigh *

Well, that's my rant for today.



The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help

Reply via email to